<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Handbook of Lower Extremity Infections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leinfections.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leinfections.com</link>
	<description>Companion Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:15:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Preventing Surgical Infections by wsiegle</title>
		<link>http://www.leinfections.com/mrsa/preventing-surgical-infections/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>wsiegle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leinfections.com/?p=246#comment-16</guid>
		<description>in responce to the following &quot;The rate of S. aureus infection was 3.4% in the treated group vs. 7.7% in the placebo group.    Interestingly, ALL were methicillin susceptible (MSSA) so the study may, or may not be able to be extrapolated to MRSA carriage.&quot; 

In the treatment of the Pt&#039;s nasal mucosa I am assuming the method of infection transmission to be the aerosolization Staph.  It may ,therefore, be prudent to compare the infection rates of  treating a Pt&#039;s nares with simply employing the same surgical masks all others in the OR wear. In addition to finding out which method would be superior to controlling infection it could also give insight to the time frame in which a Pt carring Staph. could infect their surgical wound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in responce to the following &#8220;The rate of S. aureus infection was 3.4% in the treated group vs. 7.7% in the placebo group.    Interestingly, ALL were methicillin susceptible (MSSA) so the study may, or may not be able to be extrapolated to MRSA carriage.&#8221; </p>
<p>In the treatment of the Pt&#8217;s nasal mucosa I am assuming the method of infection transmission to be the aerosolization Staph.  It may ,therefore, be prudent to compare the infection rates of  treating a Pt&#8217;s nares with simply employing the same surgical masks all others in the OR wear. In addition to finding out which method would be superior to controlling infection it could also give insight to the time frame in which a Pt carring Staph. could infect their surgical wound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lasers and Onychomycosis by Peter Bird</title>
		<link>http://www.leinfections.com/onychomycosis/lasers-and-onychomycosis/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leinfections.com/?p=259#comment-15</guid>
		<description>There has been some &quot;heated&quot; debate going over 6 pages at Podiatry Arena on this:
http://www.podiatry-arena.com/podiatry-forum/showthread.php?t=22925

You should get involved! I am sure your expertise would be welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been some &#8220;heated&#8221; debate going over 6 pages at Podiatry Arena on this:<br />
<a href="http://www.podiatry-arena.com/podiatry-forum/showthread.php?t=22925" rel="nofollow">http://www.podiatry-arena.com/podiatry-forum/showthread.php?t=22925</a></p>
<p>You should get involved! I am sure your expertise would be welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome by HH</title>
		<link>http://www.leinfections.com/welcome/welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>HH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leinfections.com/?p=46#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Anything new to add to comments in book about laser tx of fungal nails. In my area there are  ads for DPMs offering this @1K per tx!.
My Q is , does it work?
Same Q for topical Lamisil 1% solution; aside from recent technical trial failure.
Thanks, HH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything new to add to comments in book about laser tx of fungal nails. In my area there are  ads for DPMs offering this @1K per tx!.<br />
My Q is , does it work?<br />
Same Q for topical Lamisil 1% solution; aside from recent technical trial failure.<br />
Thanks, HH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Handbook is Ready by podiatrist1@optonline.net</title>
		<link>http://www.leinfections.com/book/the-handbook-is-ready/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>podiatrist1@optonline.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leinfections.com/?p=127#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I have been in practice since 1985 and 
I have to thank Dr. Joseph Podiatrist
for all his devotion and time he spent
trying to educate other podiatrists.
Dr. Joseph Podiatrist you are appreciated by me and others who learn from your expertise.
Daniel Chaskin DPM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been in practice since 1985 and<br />
I have to thank Dr. Joseph Podiatrist<br />
for all his devotion and time he spent<br />
trying to educate other podiatrists.<br />
Dr. Joseph Podiatrist you are appreciated by me and others who learn from your expertise.<br />
Daniel Chaskin DPM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Escalation vs. De-escalation Therapy by Ribotsky</title>
		<link>http://www.leinfections.com/mrsa/escalation-vs-de-escalation-therapy/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Ribotsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leinfections.com/?p=162#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I must thank Dr. Joseph for once again having the skill, knowledge and aptitude to be on the fore front of our profession.  While my initial thought would be to continue to treat patients as I have with escalating therapy; as following my ID Mentor (who’s knowledge in this area, dwarfs everyone), I am going to change and take the precautions for treating MRSA first.   My new mantra is preventing the worse is never wrong, hey, I have an alarm system for basically the same reason, preventing the worse case.  

 

Bret Ribotsky
www.PodiatricSuccess.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must thank Dr. Joseph for once again having the skill, knowledge and aptitude to be on the fore front of our profession.  While my initial thought would be to continue to treat patients as I have with escalating therapy; as following my ID Mentor (who’s knowledge in this area, dwarfs everyone), I am going to change and take the precautions for treating MRSA first.   My new mantra is preventing the worse is never wrong, hey, I have an alarm system for basically the same reason, preventing the worse case.  </p>
<p>Bret Ribotsky<br />
<a href="http://www.PodiatricSuccess.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.PodiatricSuccess.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Preview this Book by Warren S. Joseph, DPM, FIDSA</title>
		<link>http://www.leinfections.com/book/preview-this-book/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren S. Joseph, DPM, FIDSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leinfections.com/?p=75#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your kind words and thoughtful questions.  You are correct that the immune compromise found in patients with diabetes is pretty much taken as gospel without much supporting evidence.  I ran Medline searches using lots of combinations of terms.  I actually asked around to a few of the “diabetic foot gurus” in our profession looking for some good specific references to pass on to the readership.  The response was pretty universal that the data was weak.  I would direct you to the following reference as a starting point to look into the subject (thanks to Dr. Frykberg):  Delamaire M, et al. Impaired leukocyte functions in diabetic patients.  Diabetic Med 1997;14:29-34. 

As for the difference between bacteriostatic and bactericidal drugs, there were two interesting articles published in Clinical Infectious Diseases within a few months of each other in 2004.  The first by Pankey and Sabath in March and the second by Finberg and Moellering in November both pretty much concluded that, at least for most skin and skin structure infections, there was no evidence to support the superiority of one over the other.  This may not be true in the treatment of endocarditis or nervous system infections.  Although the 2nd Edition did talk about the use of cidal agents in patients with immune compromise, it may be more of a theoretical advantage than one proven in trials.  My thinking has “adjusted” a bit given the two papers mentioned above by some of the top people in the field.  

Finally, as to your question about how diabetic patients contribute to the development of multi-drug resistant bacteria, I really feel that it is an issue of overuse of antibiotics.  Many clinicians see a clinically non infected ulceration and automatically write a prescription (or, worse, they bow to the patient’s demand for an antibiotic…”I have diabetes so I know I need an antibiotic!”).  Then, the patient is kept on the drug until the wound heals!  This puts tremendous selection pressure on the patient’s inherent flora allowing bugs resistant to the prescribed antibiotic to thrive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your kind words and thoughtful questions.  You are correct that the immune compromise found in patients with diabetes is pretty much taken as gospel without much supporting evidence.  I ran Medline searches using lots of combinations of terms.  I actually asked around to a few of the “diabetic foot gurus” in our profession looking for some good specific references to pass on to the readership.  The response was pretty universal that the data was weak.  I would direct you to the following reference as a starting point to look into the subject (thanks to Dr. Frykberg):  Delamaire M, et al. Impaired leukocyte functions in diabetic patients.  Diabetic Med 1997;14:29-34. </p>
<p>As for the difference between bacteriostatic and bactericidal drugs, there were two interesting articles published in Clinical Infectious Diseases within a few months of each other in 2004.  The first by Pankey and Sabath in March and the second by Finberg and Moellering in November both pretty much concluded that, at least for most skin and skin structure infections, there was no evidence to support the superiority of one over the other.  This may not be true in the treatment of endocarditis or nervous system infections.  Although the 2nd Edition did talk about the use of cidal agents in patients with immune compromise, it may be more of a theoretical advantage than one proven in trials.  My thinking has “adjusted” a bit given the two papers mentioned above by some of the top people in the field.  </p>
<p>Finally, as to your question about how diabetic patients contribute to the development of multi-drug resistant bacteria, I really feel that it is an issue of overuse of antibiotics.  Many clinicians see a clinically non infected ulceration and automatically write a prescription (or, worse, they bow to the patient’s demand for an antibiotic…”I have diabetes so I know I need an antibiotic!”).  Then, the patient is kept on the drug until the wound heals!  This puts tremendous selection pressure on the patient’s inherent flora allowing bugs resistant to the prescribed antibiotic to thrive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Preview this Book by odesit81</title>
		<link>http://www.leinfections.com/book/preview-this-book/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>odesit81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 23:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leinfections.com/?p=75#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Hello Dr. Joseph,

 I am currently reading the second edition of your book (I purchased the 3rd one but it has not become available yet). Right now I am reading the chapter on the &quot;Diabetic Foot Infections&quot;. I really like how the text is succinct yet very comprehensive. My question is regarding the Clinical significance part of the chapter on page 107. It talks about Immune system dysfunctions associated with uncontrolled diabetes. could you direct me to the reference article/source you used for this section. I would really like to learn more about immunopathy aspect of this disease. Although it sounds like common sense, no one really emphasizes the use of bacteriostatic meds in non-immunocompromised patient. This is a great comment. Also, I would really like to learn more about how diabetic patients potentially contribute to the development muli-drug resistant bacteria. I guess this is more of public health issue. Or is it wrong to think of it this way and the problem lies with the physicians who prescribe inappropriately? Thank you. Sincerely, Marat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Dr. Joseph,</p>
<p> I am currently reading the second edition of your book (I purchased the 3rd one but it has not become available yet). Right now I am reading the chapter on the &#8220;Diabetic Foot Infections&#8221;. I really like how the text is succinct yet very comprehensive. My question is regarding the Clinical significance part of the chapter on page 107. It talks about Immune system dysfunctions associated with uncontrolled diabetes. could you direct me to the reference article/source you used for this section. I would really like to learn more about immunopathy aspect of this disease. Although it sounds like common sense, no one really emphasizes the use of bacteriostatic meds in non-immunocompromised patient. This is a great comment. Also, I would really like to learn more about how diabetic patients potentially contribute to the development muli-drug resistant bacteria. I guess this is more of public health issue. Or is it wrong to think of it this way and the problem lies with the physicians who prescribe inappropriately? Thank you. Sincerely, Marat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome by Warren S. Joseph, DPM, FIDSA</title>
		<link>http://www.leinfections.com/welcome/welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren S. Joseph, DPM, FIDSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leinfections.com/?p=46#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your question.  The 3rd Edition of the Handbook of Lower Extremity Infections is the only book published that is specific for treatment of infections that you would see in your daily practice.  Sure you could buy the latest edition of Mandell’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, considered by some to be the “bible” on the subject but it will set you back $400 and about 75% of the content will be extraneous to what you do every day.  Furthermore, unlike a big bulky textbook, the Handbook is just that…designed to be an easy to use and search reference that will allow you to find the answer to your question easily presented in a point by point format.  If you have an earlier version of the Handbook, the 3rd Edition is worthwhile because it has been fully updated to reflect the latest medical evidence, important in this age of evidence based medicine.  Each chapter has been revised or expanded and a new chapter has been added on MRSA.  Finally, if you wonder why to buy the book since you can access this blog for free; my answer would be that this is a COMPANION blog.  It is meant to supplement, not supplant the book.  I will use the blog to comment on the latest literature as it comes out, to give my opinion about an ID topic that is currently making headlines or, to just discuss an area that I feel is important.  It also gives readers a chance to correspond and have a give and take. Thanks again for your interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your question.  The 3rd Edition of the Handbook of Lower Extremity Infections is the only book published that is specific for treatment of infections that you would see in your daily practice.  Sure you could buy the latest edition of Mandell’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, considered by some to be the “bible” on the subject but it will set you back $400 and about 75% of the content will be extraneous to what you do every day.  Furthermore, unlike a big bulky textbook, the Handbook is just that…designed to be an easy to use and search reference that will allow you to find the answer to your question easily presented in a point by point format.  If you have an earlier version of the Handbook, the 3rd Edition is worthwhile because it has been fully updated to reflect the latest medical evidence, important in this age of evidence based medicine.  Each chapter has been revised or expanded and a new chapter has been added on MRSA.  Finally, if you wonder why to buy the book since you can access this blog for free; my answer would be that this is a COMPANION blog.  It is meant to supplement, not supplant the book.  I will use the blog to comment on the latest literature as it comes out, to give my opinion about an ID topic that is currently making headlines or, to just discuss an area that I feel is important.  It also gives readers a chance to correspond and have a give and take. Thanks again for your interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome by rgfdpm</title>
		<link>http://www.leinfections.com/welcome/welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>rgfdpm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 22:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leinfections.com/?p=46#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Why should I buy the book?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should I buy the book?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
